poker logo Live Chat Player Zone Download Poker x Poker Info
DATE: May 26 2012
TIME :
home download promotions tournaments how to play poker help poker forum

   Poker.co.uk - Poker news archive
Download
Affiliates
Support
Site Map
The Gambling Network
Poker
Gambling Forum
Poker Forum
Bingo
Poker Domain Names

Poker.co.uk - Poker News Archive

Thursday 21st February 2008

US Congress Failure To Act Proves Expensive



The US Department of Justice has turned a minor legal problem limited to interstate horseracing into a major headache on all aspects of remote wagering including purely intrastate betting on horseracing, dog racing and possibly poker.

This is the opinion of Nelson Rose, Professor of Law at California’s Whittier Law School and founder of GamblingAndTheLaw.com, who stated that a decision against the US by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) over the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) treaty was not that bad but had been made worse by the American’s unwillingness to change.

In 2005 a case brought by Antigua, the WTO ruled that America must allow international cross-border betting on horseracing as it allowed local wagers under the Interstate Horseracing Act. However, Congress did nothing, allowing time for Antigua to find ways to introduce all forms of intrastate gambling allowed into the US, precipitating sanctions or possibly a big payout for the small island nation.

“I would have given a law student a D grade if they had done what the Department of Justice did and that’s only because I don’t like to fail anyone,” said Rose.

“Imagine a student turning in a paper containing a very weak argument. The professor gives the paper a poor grade and explains why the argument won’t work. The professor then gives an assignment of explaining what changes the client has to make in the way it does business. The student now takes a year to answer and instead of stating what changes have to be made the student says that the client is now in complete compliance because it deserved to win.

“This is what the Department of Justice did and it is hard to conceive of a lawyer making the same losing arguments again in front of the same judges.”

 

Source: OnlineCasinoNews


View Similar Stories
Online Poker isn’t a Wire Act
Inaugural World Poker Congress Aims to Unite Industry
Virgin launches Virgin Games
Woolie Thinking For Online Casino
TouchStone Relaunches Online Casino


Discuss this story in the Poker Forum. Last 5 Posts:
Saturday 26th May, 2012:   WSOP Fantasy Draft 2012
Saturday 26th May, 2012:   New Bap - Day 3
Saturday 26th May, 2012:   Party Poker and William Hill (iPoker) BAP
Saturday 26th May, 2012:   Brag Thread! Post your greatest wins (online or live) here.
Friday 25th May, 2012:   One way poker Swapsies

 
Poker.co.uk is part of The Gambling Network | Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Gamble Aware
Poker.co.uk is operated by InTouch Poker Ltd (hereinafter called the "Company"), a limited liability company with registration number C44236, registered in Malta (a member of the EU since May 2004). The Company’s registered address is at Vincenti Buildings, Suite 623, 14/19 Strait Street, Valletta VLT 1432, Malta. The Company operates the Poker.co.uk online poker room under a provisional license issued and regulated by the Lotteries and Gaming Authority ("LGA") of Malta (issued on 2 December 2008, number LGA/CL3/412/2007). The software used for operating the Poker.co.uk online poker room is licensed from Boss Media Malta Poker Limited. Our services are not available to residents of the United States, US Virgin Islands, US Minor Outlying Areas or Turkey or any other jurisdiction that legally prohibits its citizens from engaging in online gaming.